FIELD STUDY METHODOLOGY
Conventional thinking for most oil
professionals is that exploring for, finding, and developing
reserves is exciting and rewarding, and that conducting a field
study is dull, unappreciated and does not contribute to the company's
bottom line. Conventional thinking is wrong.
A field study is actually the final
phase of prospecting on a property where additional reserves
can be found with new ideas. A field study is not a bookkeeping
activity.
One company we are familiar with has
consistently over the years found, developed and added reserves
equal to, or in excess of the volumes produced. About 60 percent
of the reserves were added as a result of additional development
in old fields and were identified after a thorough field study.
The key to exploring in developed
fields is to integrate all the geological, geophysical and engineering
information to draw the best geological interpretation possible
and then to focus in on those areas and reservoirs where production
performance does not fit the current geological interpretation.
Volumetric reserves are compared to the reserves estimated by
the performance of the wells and the reservoirs in the field.
The resolution of these differences often points out the areas
to further explore in and to complete the development of the
field.
A number of optional interpretations
for these anomalies are frequently tested before the best fit
is determined. The various optional interpretations may include
a different fault pattern, a new correlation, recognition of
nonconnected sand members or channels, inadequate perforated
intervals, or poor completion and production practices.
The place to prospect for oil and
gas is where oil and gas have been found. |
PlZ PLOTS
The P/Z plot is a visual solution to the
gas material balance, where the original gas volume equals the remaining
gas volume plus the volume of gas produced. In mathematical terms this
is expressed as:

If the volume of a reservoir does not change
with production, this equation will plot as a straight line. If water
enters into and reduces the size of the reservoir, then the plot will
form a curved line. Whereas the straight line can be extrapolated to
determine the original gas in place, the curved line can only serve
to identify that there is a full or partial water drive affecting the
performance of the reservoir.
All gas reservoirs that are volumetric will
generate a P/Z that plots as a straight line. (Volumetric reservoirs
are reservoirs where the physical volume does not change with production
of the oil and gas reserves.) The reverse statement that all P/Z's
that plot as a straight line indicate a volumetric reservoir is not
accurate.
Partial water drive reservoirs, where the
rate of production greatly exceeds the rate of water influx will plot
as a straight line and cannot be distinguished from a volumetric reservoir.
Figure 1 is a P/Z plot for a large gas reservoir in the Gulf of Mexico.
Up to the recovery of about 300 BCF the P/Z plot formed a very creditable
straight line that extrapolated out to an original gas in place volume
of 710 BCF, a volume much greater than the mapped volume of 500 BCF.
After the production of about 300 BCF the P/Z plot became concave and
formed a new straight line that extrapolated out to an original gas
in place volume of about 464 BCF.

The P/Z plot for a partial water drive reservoir
is sensitive to the rate of production and projects out to a greater
than actual gas in place volume. Notice in Figure 2 that the rate of
production from the reservoir doubled during the period of time that
the _P/Z _plot changed slope. A Havlena and Odeh plot would be required
to determine the original gas in place.

When evaluating a reservoir using data,
la wa,ys look for the possible efi partial water drive.
Q L T - SCREW FAULTS (QUICK LOOK
TECHNIQUE)
A screw fault is a fault that laterally
reverses its direction of dip. This is a mapping contrariety that cannot
exist in extensional areas and has only a questionable possibility
in compressional areas.
Consider Fault B in Figure 3 which is a
completed structure map on the AA Sand. Follow the fault trace from
West to East. Notice to the West that the contours indicate a fault
downthrown to the South. Consider the area between the -8,400-ft and
-8,350-ft contours downthrown to the fault in the eastern region. At
this position the map indicates that the fault changed its direction
of dip from South to North. Observe all the contours placed downthrown
to the fault from Location A to B as in contrast to only one contour
(-8,400-ft) upthrown. Fault B is a screw fault.

Also, consider Location D (Figure 3) on
Fault A. Notice that Fault A has reduced in size e--'(Vertical Separation)
from 300 ft at Location C to approximately 50 ft at Location D. Fault
A is working toward becoming a screw fault.
A screw fault is indicative of an incorrect
fault interpretation. Figure 4 is the correct interpretation for the
area mapped and is significantly different. The prospective areas are
totally different.

A map with a recognized screw fault in an
area of interest should be rejected until the problem can be resolved. |