SHARED EARTH MODELING:
A TRUE SYNERGISTIC APPROACH
Daniel J. Tearpock and James C. Brenneke
Subsurface Consultants & Associates, LLC
Houston, Texas, USA
ABSTRACT
In order to develop an accurate shared
earth model, companies must apply a true synergistic approach
to multidisciplinary team studies. A shared earth model that
can truly add value and upside potential to a company must implement
its teamwork such that "The Whole Is Greater Than The Sum Of
Its Parts."
THE SHARED EARTH MODEL
It is a truism that geologists, geophysicists,
and engineers all work with a single earth. The model that each
discipline develops must therefore be compatible with the model
of every other discipline if the resultant model is to be correct.
A shared earth model is a single model of a portion of the earth
that seamlessly incorporates the observations, interpretations
and data of each specialist involved in its development.
The requirement that a correct model
incorporate data from all disciplines seems obvious, but this
requirement is often overlooked. For example, most geophysicists
incorporate log tops picked by geologists into their interpretation.
Fault cuts identified by geologists on well logs are less frequently
used, but faults observed in a well log should be visible on
seismic if the missing section is greater than the resolution
of the seismic data. Too often, fault cuts are not used by geophysicists
to aid in the identification of subtle or complicated faulting.
The reverse is also common. Geologists rarely check with geophysicists
to see if seismically visible faults cut wellbores. If a fault
is interpreted on seismic to cut a wellbore, the fault should
either be observable by correlation in the well log or the seismic
interpretation is incorrect. Too few geoscience teams actually
perform these crosschecks to verify the accuracy of their shared
earth model.
Crosschecking fault cuts in well logs
with faults observed on seismic offers additional information
about the velocity field used in the model. If fault cuts are
clearly observed in well logs and on seismic data, but they do
not tie, this may be an indication that the velocity model being
used to relate seismic time to depth is wrong. Adjustment of
the velocity model to allow the well data to tie the seismic
data improves the entire model. |
THE COMPOSITE BRAIN
Many problems being addressed by the petroleum
industry require specialized knowledge about too many subjects to be
adequately addressed by an individual. The need for multiple specialists
has led to the creation of multidisciplinary teams in many E&P
companies. Multidisciplinary teams can either function linearly or
they can function synergistically to form what we term the "Composite
Brain" (Fig. 1).

Linear Multidisciplinary Teams
If teams function linearly, each discipline
does its work separately and sequentially. Consider the case of a multidisciplinary
team studying an older field. The geologist first correlates the well
logs and develops a general depositional model. The log tops are transferred
from the paper well logs to the seismic data using some velocity model.
The geophysicist uses the log tops to aid in his interpretation of
the seismic data. If there are any discrepancies between the log interpretation
and the seismic interpretation, the geologist may go back and modify
the geologic interpretation as required. Once the geologist and geophysicist
have reached a consistent interpretation, structure and isochore maps
are generated. These maps are passed along to the reservoir engineer
who compares well performance with volumetric estimates of reserves.
If any production anomalies are identified, the geologist and geophysicist
may review and modify their work again, as necessary.
Once production anomalies are resolved,
the geologist, geophysicist and reservoir engineer identify any remaining
potential. Drilling targets are passed alone to the drilling engineer
who plans the well and estimates the drilling and completion costs.
The well plan is passed back to the geologist who plots where the well
will intersect each mapped horizon and fault. The reservoir engineer
determines the current pressure of any reservoir intersected by the
well plan and cost estimate to deal with any unexpected drilling problems
such as drilling through depleted reservoirs. The reservoir engineer
runs economics on the final cost estimate. If the economics are favorable,
the project proceeds, if not, a new set of drilling targets may be
passed to the drilling engineer to start the process again.
Synergistic Multidisciplinary
Teams
Contrast the above workflow with that of
a synergistic multidisciplinary team (Fig 2). In a synergistic team,
work is done in parallel rather than in sequence and
information flows in all directions in much the same way that different
parts of our "Composite Brain" function together. The geologist, geophysicist
and reservoir engineer all work on their tasks simultaneously, sharing
information and discussing problems. A well plan is developed within
the shared earth model generated by the rest of the team. The drilling
engineer has real time feedback from the team regarding the well.

The real power of the synergistic team does
not just lie in more effectively accomplishing the same set of tasks
as the linear team. The real power of synergistic teamwork is unleashed
when one team member observes something that explains another team
member's data, opening the way for new concepts. Synergistic teams
find answers to questions that linear teams never recognize, just as
we can recognize problems and solutions using all of our senses that
no individual sense could recognize alone.
The Role of Software
Properly designed software is of enormous
value to the effective functioning of a synergistic team, acting as
the neurons of the composite brain. The advantages of interpretation
software has been most widely recognized by geophysicists who have
used it to make the two-dimensional interpretation of 3-D seismic data
much more efficient. Recent advances in geophysical interpretation
software have begun to allow three-dimensional interpretation of 3-D
seismic data, promising additional gains in productivity. Reservoir
engineers have also eagerly embraced software for the creation of production
databases, projecting decline curves and calculating economics.
Geologists have lagged in their use of computers
for several reasons including the lack of digital log databases, limited
computer proficiency and primitive software design. All of these problems
are being addressed with solutions forthcoming, however, and geologists
stand of the brink of a significant increase in productivity.
Recent developments in software integration
are beginning to allow the use of a single database to store all information
about a field, including geophysical, geological and engineering data.
This database is, in effect, a shared earth model.
Work done by one team member in terms of picking log tops, seismic
horizons or designing a well path is instantly available to all team
members. Team members no longer have to consciously share data; all
data is available to all members of the team through the common database.
THE KEY TO SYNERGISTIC
TEAM SUCCESS
Even well designed software will not automatically
turn every multidisciplinary team into a synergistic team. Synergistic
teams do not happen by accident. They are the result of careful planning
and nurturing. Successful synergistic teams share several common characteristics.
Common Goals and Objectives
An effective team needs clearly defined
directions and measurable results. Management must provide the overall
goals and direction of a project. It is then up to the team itself
to apply their overall knowledge and skills to develop and implement
a plan centered around the common goals and objectives.
Planning
Planning is critical for an effective synergistic
team. Project planning must be done by the entire multidisciplinary
team. Each person must provide their thoughts, ideas and input to a
final project plan. Proper planning identifies tasks on the critical
path, insuring that one part of the multi-disciplinary team is not
waiting unnecessarily on results from another part of the team. Planning
is essential for organizing complex tasks, fostering good communication
and obtaining results.
Communication
Successful synergistic teams have excellent
communication between team members. Well-designed and integrated software
can aid in this communication, but it is not enough. Our experience
has shown that physical proximity is the biggest element
in fostering communication within a team. Ideally, all team members
should be located in a single common area that contains the necessary
computers and data resources for the team. When
team members are in a single room, information and ideas flow freely
between team members. Team members feed off each other's energy and
ideas, leading to breakthroughs in understanding.
When team members are dispersed, the tendency
is to wait until it is convenient to share observations or request
cooperation. Frequently it can be days or weeks before observations
are shared; occasionally critical observations or questions may
even be forgotten. Progress is steady but slow and
breakthroughs are rare.
Interdependency
To develop a true, accurate shared earth
model, multidisciplinary teams must implement a plan, performing complex
tasks with a high degree of interdependency. The total project success
depends on each team member for success. What each team member does
affects the others, rather than performing as separate individuals
in an independent linear process.
Management Support
Management support is essential for a successful
synergistic team. Once management has created a team, clearly articulated
its goals, and provided the necessary resources, the team must be provided
the necessary autonomy and authority to accomplish its goals. Micro-managing
multi -disciplinary teams is likely to prove stultifying, preventing
true synergy from ever developing.
CONCLUSIONS
The upstream petroleum industry is rapidly
moving toward the development of an accurate shared earth model for
exploration as well as development projects. The corporate value of
a shared earth model lies in its added value and reduction in costs.
The added value is in finding more oil and gas resources with reduction
in costs resulting from less dry holes, faster project completion and
more accurate results.
A true shared earth model requires a synergistic
approach to multidisciplinary team studies, the application of a proven
technical philosophy, integrated into advanced software and management
understanding and support. A shared earth model proves its value when "The
Whole is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts".
REFERENCES
Tearpock, D.J. and Bischke, R.E., 1991,
Applied Subsurface Geological Mapping, Prentice Hall, N.J., 649 p.
Tearpock, D.J., Bischke, R.E. and Brewton,
J.L., 1994, Quick Look Techniques for Prospect Evaluation, SOG Press
La., 286 p.
Spiegel, J. and Torres, C., 1994, Manager's
Official Guide to Team Working, Pfeiffer & Company, 159 p.
Tearpock, D.J., 1994, Synergistic Team Organization/Field
Study Methodology, (A Short Course), Subsurface Consultants & Associates,
230 p. |